Cortázar vs. Picasso

Cortázar vs. Picasso: Two Creative Approaches

While Julio Cortázar viewed writing as a process driven by inspiration, Picasso believed in daily discipline.

For Cortázar, the idea of writing every day from 9 a.m. to 2 p.m., like some writers disciplined themselves to do, felt mechanical. He preferred to wait for writing to emerge from an internal need, without forcing it.

His playful and spontaneous approach led him to create only when he felt the call, respecting the rhythm of his own inspiration.

In contrast, Picasso believed in the importance of constant and disciplined work.

His famous phrase "Inspiration exists, but it has to find you working" reflects his belief that creativity shouldn't rely on special moments. For him, daily production was the path to discovering new ideas, innovating, and evolving as an artist.

Perhaps that´s why Cortázar at times believed that he wasn´t a “professional” writer, based on that he lacked tat discipline. He did however revolutionize literature, particularly Latin-American literature and has become one of the most influential writers in history.

Both approaches highlight different ways to tackle the creative process. While Cortázar favored freedom and intuition, Picasso relied on routine and daily effort as the catalysts for creativity.

In the end, both achieved iconic works, though by very different paths.

What would your creative style be when creating something: steady discipline or playing with inspiration?

Have a nice day,

Claudio.